-
根据以下资料,回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
-
倾听是你能做出的一个最省钱的让步。
-
患者男,24岁,因“体重持续增加7年,嗜睡3年,加重1个月”来诊。患者7年前无明显诱因出现体重持续增加,从65kg增加到105kg。近3年出现睡眠增多,每日睡10+h,伴有记忆力减退。近1个月来,困倦感明显加重。病来无头痛,无视力下降,尿、粪正常。查体:T37.2℃,P90次/min,R25次/min,BP126/88mmHg;意识清楚,言语含糊;手背及胸背部皮肤干燥、粗糙、皲裂,面部臃肿;甲状腺不大;双瞳孔等大正圆,D=2.5mm,对光反射灵敏,视力、视野粗测正常;鼻、唇肥厚,舌大声粗;颈软,心、肺、腹无明显异常;四肢粗大,手指粗壮,手背及手掌肥厚,肌力、肌张力正常,病理反射阴性。颅脑MRI:垂体增大,视交叉受压上移,垂体柄显示欠佳,考虑存在垂体瘤。诊断考虑(提示:实验室检查:FT4<5.15pmol/L,FT3<1.54pmol/L,TSH>100mU/L。心脏彩超:少量心包积液,TPOAb、TgAb正常。甲状腺彩超:甲状腺体积缩小。)()。
-
有关右心室和肺动脉之间的关系,下列描述哪一项是错误的?
-
餐前酒(Pre-DinnerDrinks)又称开胃酒(Aperitif)。
-
下面关于钱伟长描述不正确的一项是:()
-
客车安全窗应易于向外推开或用手锤击破玻璃,在其附近应备有便于取用的击碎出口玻璃的专用工具。
-
哪位学者被称为“组织理论之父”()
-
心脏电复律两电极板分别置于胸骨左缘第2~第3肋间和心尖部。()
-
脱氧元素对氧的亲和力必须()铁对氧的亲和力。