主页
学科
搜索
账户
常见问题
当前学科：第一章财产保险实务
题目：
单选
于先生投保家庭财产综合险，他与邻居王先生共同拥有一个养鱼塘，在一次喂食过量后，鱼塘里的鱼全部死亡，则保险公司（）赔偿于先生的损失。
A . 应该
B . 不应该
C . 根据保险条款而定
D . 根据法律规定
答案：
<查看本题扣1积分>
查看答案
答案不对？请尝试站内搜索
推荐知识点:
中药丹参原植物来源于
对流室采用钉头管，可以提高（）
下述不是Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的特点的是（）.
心绞痛进一步检查
根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
男性患者29岁，一年前因左肾、左输尿管及膀胱结核，行左肾和左输尿管切除术，手术后行抗结核治疗8个月。日前患者尿常规检查阴性，IVP显示右肾轻度积水，但患者尿频症状明显加重，原因是（）
根据国有资产管理法律制度的规定，事业单位的下列行为中，应当报同级财政部门审批的是（ ）。
下列除哪项外均是黄芪的功效（）
VOR机载设备由（）等构成。
新版GSP正式颁布的时间（）。