皮日休《原谤》的议论对象是（）。_大学语文_全学科试题题库

当前学科：大学语文

题目：单选
皮日休《原谤》的议论对象是（）。
答案： <查看本题扣1积分>

查看答案

答案不对？请尝试站内搜索

推荐知识点:

提高道路通行能力的主要措施有哪些？

工作职位评价系统包括()。A、评价指标子系统B、评价标准子系统C、评价方法子系统D、组织控制子系统

根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

非治疗心绞痛的措施是（）

我国膳食指南建议的食盐摄入量为（）

中华人民共和国商标法规定：带有民族歧视性的标志不得作为商标使用。

关于岑参《走马川行奉送出师西征》内容表述正确的是（）。

与左室收缩功能关系最小的是（）

肠鸣腹痛、大便泄泻、泻必腹痛、泻后痛缓、舌苔薄白、脉两关不调、左弦而右缓，治疗应选用（）脘腹痞闷、食少难消、大便溏薄、倦怠乏力、苔腻微黄、脉虚弱，治疗应选用（）

如某出口瓷器商欲投保金额1000元，免赔率5%，出运货物后实际破损为100元，保险公司应赔偿（）.