主页
学科
搜索
账户
常见问题
当前学科：无损检测技术资格人员考试
题目：
填空题
焊接接头冷却到室温后并在一定时间（几小时、几天、甚至十几天）才出现的焊接冷裂纹叫（）。
答案：
<查看本题扣1积分>
查看答案
答案不对？请尝试站内搜索
推荐知识点:
当钢屋架安装过程中垂直偏差过大时，应在屋架间加设（）以增强稳定性。
维普数据库，以下是文献的题目，请问哪几篇是辛忠老师发表的论文？（）
胆囊内镜对小肠出血、胃镜及结肠镜检查无异常的消化道出血患者具有重要价值。
凝汽器管板脏污的现象（）。
打透老空后，如孔内无水流出，经瓦斯员检查有有害气体溢出时，立即（）。
下列机构有哪些是金融机构（）。
某饭店娱乐场所，吸引了许多宾客，但除娱乐的基本门票外，酒水销售量很小。如果你是该场所的经理，你将如何进行酒水推销，以此来增加娱乐收入。
症见疮疡肿毒初起，红肿焮痛，身热凛寒，苔薄白，脉数有力。宜选用()
根据以下资料，回答题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they